Prompt Picker
Prompt Picker: Find the Best LLM System Prompts
Prompt Picker helps you systematically test and rank system prompts for your LLM apps using double-blind experiments over simulated user inputs.
Overview
Choosing the right system prompt for an LLM-powered application often comes down to guesswork, but Prompt Picker replaces that guesswork with data. The tool lets you run structured experiments across multiple candidate system prompts, simulated user inputs, and model parameters, then evaluates the resulting generations in a double-blind format so your judgments stay unbiased. By comparing outputs head-to-head and using an ELO-based ranking system, Prompt Picker surfaces which exact prompt configuration performs best for your use case.
This makes it especially valuable for teams building chat-based products, custom instruction sets, or any application where the quality of the system prompt directly impacts user experience and operational costs. Instead of manually eyeballing outputs or relying on intuition, developers and prompt engineers can quantify prompt performance, shorten prompts to cut token costs, and confidently select the configuration that produces the most helpful, consistent responses.
Capabilities & Features
- System prompts
- Custom instructions
- LLM
- Experimentation
- Prompt engineering
- AI applications
- GPT-3.5-turbo
- Prompt optimization
Core Features
- Run experiments with multiple system prompts in parallel
- Evaluate prompt performance using simulated user interactions
- ELO-based ranking system for candidate prompts
- Double-blind evaluation setup to reduce bias
- Configurable language model parameters for testing
Use Cases
- Optimizing custom instructions for a customer-facing chatbot
- Reducing token usage and query costs by trimming unnecessary prompt length
- Comparing multiple prompt variations before deploying an LLM app
- Fine-tuning ChatGPT custom instructions for more helpful responses
- Running systematic A/B-style tests on prompt wording and structure
Best For
- AI application developers
- ChatGPT power users
- Prompt engineers
- LLM researchers
- Product teams building conversational AI
Pros
- •Removes guesswork from prompt selection with structured experimentation
- •Double-blind setup helps ensure unbiased evaluation results
- •ELO ranking system provides a clear, quantifiable way to compare prompts
- •Supports parallel testing of multiple prompt variations at once
- •Can help lower per-query costs by identifying leaner, equally effective prompts
Cons
- •Limited to GPT-3.5-turbo at present, with GPT-4 support still pending
- •Relies on simulated user inputs, which may not perfectly reflect real-world usage
- •Manual comparison process could be time-consuming for large prompt sets
- •Free tier may eventually be limited as paid features are introduced
How to Use
1. Configure your experiment by defining the system prompts you want to test, sample user inputs, and the language model parameters to use.
2. Assess the resulting generations through a double-blind comparison process to avoid bias in your judgments.
3. Review the results as Prompt Picker ranks each prompt, helping you identify and adopt the best-performing configuration.
Frequently Asked Questions
Open in AI Studio
Ask our AI to evaluate if Prompt Picker fits your specific workflow.
Pricing
Prompt Picker is currently free to use, with a paid tier planned for the future that will likely unlock additional features.
Pricing data is provided as a summary. Visit the vendor website for full tier details.